Haishao.6851

I would be fine with the current cursor size with just selectable colors.I think another thing that could help stop losing the cursor would be for it to lock in place when we hold left click to rotate the camera.

We've been getting dyes, weapons, armors and other since like year 3https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Birthday_Gift

If there's a regulation in USA that goes against anet's practices, they will just find another legal way to get you to give them your money while giving you practically nothing in return. They manage to sell you virtual chairs for nearly 10$, they will find a way.

Sadly If they approve what you're saying, it could lead to the elimination of all rng in all games, thus eliminating rng drops from mobs and thus ruining the enjoyment of finding treasure and the enjoyment of the game itself. Technically everything in the game is chance, and time spent rolling on those chances of getting good treasure or loot. Since Time is money, elimination of all rng is essentially the argument you're making. Let’s not get bananas shall we? No reason for this kitten “oh no they well destroy the game.” Clearly this is about micro transactions, specifically randomized loot boxes purchasable with either real money or in game currency directly purchasable with money. The game shop will be much better if loot boxes were removed. this will destroy a ton of games, not just GW2, I don't understand why anyone wants this. Why don't parents just watch their children and the problem is solved?If some games are so extremely bad that removing lootboxes make them bankrupt, then too bad for them. They should have made a good game instead.Good games ever needed lootboxes to make money. What does parents have to do with it? People hate them. The games being targeted at children is just the cherry on top of it all. It's crap no one ever asked for and majority hate, and on top of it, most of it is targeted directly at children.Why don't you just go gamble in a casino and the problem is solved?

GW3, even though we can forget about it now.

Hmm. Something is off in this image. OH. I know! Goggles! Now I can relate. here

I'd prefer if they all had collections instead.It would also be nice if we could make more than one of each per account. Even if subsequent weapons are crafted with the boring recipes.

It's easier to get names if you use a first and last name, or even with a middle name or title.It sucks when a nice sounding name is taken, but i'd rather have that happen than have my characters stripped off their names to be given to someone else.

Makes sense since at the time they were full on that other project so no other expansion were planned for a while.Maybe that'll change now after restructuring. I'd personally prefer if they still managed to go on with the other project.

Or don't join PUG Problem solved.

I wouldn't consider making legendary "daily gold"It can certainly take only 1 day, but it will most likely takes weeks or months before you get the money back, that is if you ever do get the money back.

Gamers in 1978: "The boss is super hard, guess I will change the code." :) Gamers in 1958: "Can someone take this lawn dart out of my foot?"

It would help to have a screenshot EDIT:I went in game to find her.

I need to nail these 2 planks together but my no matter how hard I smash my kitchen sink on the nails I just can't seem to do the job. Something must be wrong with the nails. i didnt pay for the rights to nail planks, i bought a game, that was sold as the game for EVERYBODY.Every games are sold for everybody who wants to play games.

I would hope so.Sadly, though, many recent gemstore releases still don't show in wardrobe either. Like the winged headpiece from a couple month ago or even the largo fins back item from last year.

Enchanted Dragon Crown, Dragon's Eye Circlet, and Dragon Horns were added to the gemstore today but they cannot be previewed from the wardrobe, once again.

That's the opposite of a problem. It's a problem if you feel that you should have to do a little a bit of everything to get a legendary. While I personally like that I can bypass the PvP aspect, I would not be upset if ANet changed things to require it.Forcing people into that cesspit would be a good way to lose players.At least in WvW we don't have to interact with any of them.

That's the opposite of a problem.

The Queen's Gauntlet first came out in 2013. It's definitely not moving away from what the game once was.It is specifically made to be challenging.

fur on a swimsuit

never mind this post

There are a few shoulders that are smaller.Banded, Guild Defender, Scale, Reinforced Scale, Tempered Scale, Splint, Commander's, Whisper, Pit Fighter, Militia

There's really nothing unacceptable with this fight. Eater of Souls have very low HP compared to other bosses in the story, or the game in general. He's pretty much similar in strength to an Elite from Open World.All you really need to do is attack him normally, dodge away when he jumps and wait for his skill to complete before coming close again. You can also use CC skill to interrupt him when he jumps. Making the fight even faster.He put vulnerability on you with successful normal punching hits. To avoid build up of vulnerability which make you take more damage, use condition cleanses skills and try to avoid getting hit as much as possible by staying at range, dodging, blocking, or even just moving in circle around him.He sometime charges toward you if you're at range, just move out of range again when he does. He will eventually Fear you, which does nothing to help him.