Leablo.2651 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 Anet seems to think it unworthy of mention in the release notes, so here is an announcement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charrbeque.8729 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 You're absolutely right. I just checked in game. Neither of them have a vendor value anymore.In fact:The bottom of the wiki page for kralkatie ore was last updated May 21, 2019. https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Kralkatite_Ore It no longer shows a vendor value on the page for this item.However, the wiki page for diflourite crystals still shows a vendor value of 1 silver 28 copper. The page was last updated on May 15, 2019. https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Difluorite_CrystalBut in game it doesn't have a vendor value anymore.Probably because the Skyscale collection requires 250 of each LW4 currency, and they didn't want people over farming them to sell to vendors for extra gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donari.5237 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 @Charrbeque.8729 said:Probably because the Skyscale collection requires 250 of each LW4 currency, and they didn't want people over farming them to sell to vendors for extra gold.Or because they didn't want people bombarding Support with requests to let them buy back the currency they accidentally sold for coin so they can now buy Skyscale parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 Or maybe these were never meant to have a vendor value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyninja.2954 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 While I dislike stealth changes, there is a very good chance this was done to reduced the chance of accidental sales or uninformed sales to vendor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inculpatus cedo.9234 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 Just an FYI: There's been some threads/posts about this topic previously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gop.8713 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 Wouldn't they be worth more for the magic anyway . . ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blood Red Arachnid.2493 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 @Illconceived Was Na.9781 said:Or maybe these were never meant to have a vendor value. A vendor value doesn't just happen. It has to be coded and put there intentionally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blocki.4931 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 I'll just repeat what I said in the other thread: They most likely wanted to prevent abuse as you can now buy the currencies, not allowing for a direct way of trading VM for gold and thus bypassing the trading post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyan.1593 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 Why would you sell them anyway?1s28c is nothing, one must really be poor to have the need selling these. Even if you had a 2000 stack on your bank, converting them into magic is way more useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 @Blood Red Arachnid.2493 said:@"Illconceived Was Na.9781" said:Or maybe these were never meant to have a vendor value. A vendor value doesn't just happen. It has to be coded and put there intentionally. It can "just happen." Items in games are sometimes created by copy/paste, so they'll start off with the characteristics of the source object. If someone picks a non-ideal prototype and no one catches it, then there's going to be some clean up to do after.Generally, in a bureaucracy and software, it's more likely that certain types of issues are due to "oops" rather than some conspiracy to deprive people of this or that.It's all just speculative at this point, unless ANet has made an official statement about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 For what it's worth, the API for diflourite & kralk ore shows a vendor value and is flagged as "NoSell"That means the wiki is correct and misleading at the same time.Diflourite: https://api.guildwars2.com/v2/items?ids=86977Kralk Ore: https://api.guildwars2.com/v2/items?ids=86069The history on the wiki is usually reliable. Notable exceptions are when ANet makes an undocumented change (for any reason) or updates the API to conform to the original plan, which might be automatically updated in the wiki, without showing an edit date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faaris.8013 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 @Blood Red Arachnid.2493 said:@Illconceived Was Na.9781 said:Or maybe these were never meant to have a vendor value. A vendor value doesn't just happen. It has to be coded and put there intentionally. Indeed, and I can still sell legendary weapons to vendors for 1 gold. It's unlikely that the sell price was added accidentally and then removed because of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greener.6204 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 I've updated the Difluorite Crystal page. If you come across any more such items, and you're not sure how to edit the page, feel free to leave a message on the item's talk page or send a message to me (my wiki page > forum message, though I accept both). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 @"Greener.6204" said:I've updated the Difluorite Crystal page. If you come across any more such items, and you're not sure how to edit the page, feel free to leave a message on the item's talk page or send a message to me (my wiki page > forum message, though I accept both).Thanks for updating the wiki to reflect the changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.