-
Posts
10,295 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Events
Articles
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by kharmin.7683
-
That, and I think that they feel that they have to make them in such a manner so as to be seen; otherwise, who would buy skins for a weapon and not be able to show it off?
-
How To FIX The Mounts Of Guild Wars 2
kharmin.7683 replied to InfiniteRetro.9865's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
Why? It was a bonus mount and not even required to complete any content. One could argue that it shouldn't have been introduced at all since it was not needed. Personally, I hardly use the thing. I find a combination of jackal/skyscale/beetle gets me just about anywhere that I need to go. If you have some hang up about the mounts that were released after the griffon, then don't use them. Even EoD and SotO don't require them. You can get to any place on the map with the "basic" mounts (edit: and gliding) and not even need a griffon. So, again, I ask you "why?" -
You can choose what shows up in the chat window by selecting the appropriate check boxes.
-
Be very careful what you wish for. This could happen where it gets sold off to another company who decides to try to make more profits by forcing a subscription and heavy P2W model, completely abandoning horizontal progression which would force players to continue to pay and/or grind to keep up. Be very careful.
- 107 replies
-
- 16
-
I still maintain that druid came about because of raids, soulbeast was to be a wvw spec and untamed a pvp spec.
-
Hammer was to appease the group of rangers who pined nostalgic for the "bunny thumper" build from the original GW. There really was no other reason it was implemented.
-
New weapons in the future...but what about pets?
kharmin.7683 replied to Mishantress.2093's topic in Ranger
Dual hand mace. https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/topic/133939-ranger-with-mace-i-think-not/?do=getNewComment -
More shared inventory and material storage?
kharmin.7683 replied to Nimafor.1756's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
But don't the number of objects in the database make an impact? -
I'm kind of in the same boat. Pretty much took everything that I wanted. Would like to do daily (and some of them get done through regular game play anyway) but don't want to keep running up against the cap so I end up skipping them. Wonder if Anet has metrics on players like me and if they'll make some adjustments? /shrug
-
The Twisted Marionette is literally dead!
kharmin.7683 replied to Yulupuki.6230's topic in Living World
I get what you're doing here. 😄 Still, it is my opinion that many of the suggestions that grace our forum are ones that I believe would benefit a small sub-set of the playerbase which is why I often state that I would prefer resources to be spent elsewhere. Fun is subjective, as we all well know, so what one poster suggests as "fun" may not equate to others' definitions. Did the game really need fishing? Or, would those resources have been better spent with the PvP or WvW communities who are begging for it? Conversely, would putting resources into those mode generate the revenue to keep the servers running or was fishing really what brought in the big money? We have no way of really knowing. I disagree that LS1 was needed. I missed out on it having started a year and a half or so after initial release and it didn't really affect my gameplay or enjoyment of GW2. Yes, I agree, that it could be confusing to new players, but would not having LS1 remade really make or break GW2? I don't think so. There are a lot of things wrong with GW2 that should have some higher degree of focus, but I feel that Anet is too zeroed in on the next dollar to the detriment of making more of the existing content better received by the playerbase. Yes, they have to create new content to keep the engine running, but I question whether some of the decisions that have been made realized the return on the investments made. But that's just my opinion. -
More shared inventory and material storage?
kharmin.7683 replied to Nimafor.1756's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
I'm definitely no database expert! Is this considering just one player account? What if this is spread across all accounts? Does it also consider everything else that's stored in the database across all accounts as well? At what point would the integrity begin to degrade and database performance suffer? -
More shared inventory and material storage?
kharmin.7683 replied to Nimafor.1756's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
There are also database limitations to consider. That might make it more difficult. -
Race-specific contents in living world stories
kharmin.7683 replied to Furball.1236's topic in Living World
Apparently there is a bit more for Asura in EoD -
The Twisted Marionette is literally dead!
kharmin.7683 replied to Yulupuki.6230's topic in Living World
But, we got what was wished for when people were clamoring for season one and the related events. This is one of the reasons why I had preferred Anet had spent their resources elsewhere rather than re-create content for nostalgia which never works out in the way that players wanted. See also Bunny Thumper spec request for Rangers. I do agree, though, with the premise of your argument that this might have worked better as some kind of open world content. -
https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/"Search_and_Rescue!"
-
If you want pirate content, there's always Pirate101
-
What you deem "stupid" is subjective. Some players may very well like the options available. I also have limited time, yet I'm able to hit one or two world bosses and get at least 1 gold which sometimes takes less time than working through the daily. I suggest, too, that you refrain from calling another poster trollish as that goes against the forums CoC.
- 526 replies
-
- 10