Jump to content
  • Sign Up

kharmin.7683

Members
  • Posts

    10,267
  • Joined

Everything posted by kharmin.7683

  1. Exactly. So, give a title instead. "Classic Skyscale Lover" Wait. Maybe that's not such a grand idea.
  2. Certainly cost has nothing to do with it. Must be lack of desire.
  3. Another false comparison. A design philosophy and actual coding are two, distinct things that can't really be compared.
  4. You know that this would never be sufficient for those who are clamoring for it.
  5. I don't believe your argument to be valid (or at least the comparison). Anet never said no to mounts. Pretty sure I remember them saying no to additional playable races.
  6. Yeah, as a ranger main I am so not excited about mace/mace when so many better options have been suggested around here for years.
  7. The amount of time/work/resources to just adapt all of the armors to a land-walking flightless bi-pedal bird person would be staggering. I would much rather that time/work/resources be spent elsewhere.
  8. I used it. 😞 For me, it was a lot of fun dodging and juking around my target, leaping in and out and with the untamed build it was even more fun for me. Now... not so much anymore.
  9. Missed what, exactly, about it? For me, it's less fun to use than it had been.
  10. With asura as the charms on the bracelets
  11. Double-click to consume. Double-click to construct a bonfire. Fully stoked bonfires grant 60-minute boosts in karma, experience, or magic find. Bonfires last for 15 minutes. "In harsh times, we must all band together...and succeed together!" — In-game description Not sure that you can claim that the game ripped you off. The item clearly states that it is consumed.
  12. I don't need to cite anything. You're the one making the argument. The standard of proof lies with you. And the devs have nothing to do with GW2E which is what I was asking you to prove.
  13. Cite your proof for this statement, please.
  14. They took away the lunge/disengage mechanic from Ranger sword with the last update. I guess for "reasons". Probably wouldn't re-enable it on a different weapon, even if it were new. /shrug
  15. It's account bound. All characters on your account should have it in their home instance. https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Bloodstone_Brick_Oven
  16. I use GW2E and I'm as casual as you can get. Again, you seem to want to speak for players other than yourself to validate your arguments. That's not how that works.
  17. I stopped doing Fire Elemental because I would get lagged-downed from the AoE attacks. By the time I would see them, I'd get knocked silly. Just became annoying and frustrating, so I took it out of my typical WB rotation. Might be why there are less zerging it now than before? /shrug
  18. I would make extensive use of the /point and /laugh emotes
  19. So, Tyria is on Rama's Hat, which itself sits atop Rama's Hat and then it's Rama's Hats all of the way down?
  20. This has been asked before in many previous threads (please use the forums search) and ANet hasn't implemented it yet. Perhaps it is by design to make players purchase additional storage.
  21. That was the point. People asking for changes and Anet implementing different changes than what was requested.
×
×
  • Create New...