Nalla.6581 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 (edited) lock wvw servers for two weeks before the relink and then increase the prices of transfers to all servers to about 1800 gems no matter its medium,high,very high or full server it all should costs about 1800 gems then after the relinks has finish announcements there be a week for people to transfer to a new server if not after the week ends all the server and the server links would be locked again until the next relinks Edited May 6, 2022 by Nalla.6581 10 1 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sahne.6950 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 Alliance when? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkpile.7439 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 1800 gems for matchup victory is kind of bad deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman.4509 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zyreva.1078 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 It would make more sense to be the other way arround - transfers before the relinking but not after, otherwise what's the point of relinkings if players shuffle arround anyway? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Pj.2193 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 25 minutes ago, UmbraNoctis.1907 said: It would make more sense to be the other way arround - transfers before the relinking but not after, otherwise what's the point of relinkings if players shuffle arround anyway? No…. If people really wanted this to happen, (and they secretly and not so secretly don’t) you would lock it 5 minutes before the relinks were POSTED. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabi black.1824 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, Nalla.6581 said: lock wvw servers for two weeks before the relink and then increase the prices of transfers to all servers to about 1800 gems no matter its medium,high,very high or full server it all should costs about 1800 gems then after the relinks has finish announcements there be a week for people to transfer to a new server if not after the week ends all the server and the server links would be locked again until the next relinks excellent initiative, indeed let's go further, block them, only 1 transfer per year. it is now clear to everyone that they are not transfers of one or two players who reach their guild. they are transfers that abuse any logic used by the algorithm to connect teams. in a nutshell arenanet, all your work that you are doing (alliances - WR) or that you do in the future to improve the balance, will be immediately abused by groups of organized players (who want an easy and non-competitive game) practically every time just 5 minutes after you have built / calculated your balanced matches. moreover, these nice groups of migrant sheep ruin the gaming experience for everyone else too, even where anet had approached a balanced game, they deliberately choose to empty on one side to stack another part. it would be a good time to show your players that you really care about this mode and that you demand a little respect for the work you are investing. Edited May 6, 2022 by Mabi black.1824 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabi black.1824 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 3 hours ago, Sahne.6950 said: Alliance when? alliances later, as soon as they have solved bugs and various problems. transfers blocked immediately please. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabi black.1824 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Junkpile.7439 said: 1800 gems for matchup victory is kind of bad deal. if it were for me 1800 will not even be enough for you. you're stuck and that's it. build your community and your content for your team. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabi black.1824 Posted May 6, 2022 Share Posted May 6, 2022 52 minutes ago, Iceman.4509 said: No no? wait maybe I understood. numerical inferiority never, players always stacked. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamikharzeeh.8016 Posted May 7, 2022 Share Posted May 7, 2022 they'd make transfer gems 1800 in any case + need to lock the transfer simply 1 week before and 3 weeks past reset - would shut down a lot of pugs who just transfer to have easier gank times ngl the problem is, this should all not be a debate, anet promised us once again alliances to be finally released. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enkidu.5937 Posted May 7, 2022 Share Posted May 7, 2022 19 hours ago, Mabi black.1824 said: excellent initiative, indeed let's go further, block them, only 1 transfer per year. and only 5 twink accounts 😝 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkpile.7439 Posted May 7, 2022 Share Posted May 7, 2022 Could transfer have some rng element? Like you would transfer random server. Anet would get more money when players would have to try transfer many times. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman.4509 Posted May 7, 2022 Share Posted May 7, 2022 If anything we should be able to freely transfer whenever 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mabi black.1824 Posted May 7, 2022 Share Posted May 7, 2022 4 hours ago, enkidu.5937 said: and only 5 twink accounts 😝 Question, when you use your account are you associated with the unique IP address of your computer? they could tie that IP address to that account for the next 30 days. is this something that can be done? could it work? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svarty.8019 Posted May 7, 2022 Share Posted May 7, 2022 On 5/6/2022 at 11:46 AM, Nalla.6581 said: lock wvw servers for two weeks before the relink and then increase the prices of transfers to all servers to about 1800 gems no matter its medium,high,very high or full server it all should costs about 1800 gems then after the relinks has finish announcements there be a week for people to transfer to a new server if not after the week ends all the server and the server links would be locked again until the next relinks They could have done this simple change a zillion years ago but they did NOTHING. AGAIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patton the great.7126 Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 How ever would anet soak our cornerstone part of the game for more monies if this did something in the best interest of the game mode. ITS THEIR MONEY THEY WANT IT NOW NOT IN 2 WEEKS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MedievalThings.5417 Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 On 5/7/2022 at 6:26 AM, Junkpile.7439 said: Could transfer have some rng element? Like you would transfer random server. Anet would get more money when players would have to try transfer many times. Do transfers like the mounts. You can transfer to a random medium world for 1800 gems, but to transfer to a specific world you really want, that will be 5000 gems. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar Min.5834 Posted May 8, 2022 Share Posted May 8, 2022 On 5/6/2022 at 6:46 PM, Nalla.6581 said: lock wvw servers for two weeks before the relink and then increase the prices of transfers to all servers to about 1800 gems no matter its medium,high,very high or full server it all should costs about 1800 gems then after the relinks has finish announcements there be a week for people to transfer to a new server if not after the week ends all the server and the server links would be locked again until the next relinks Please stop beating the dead horse. Let it R. I. P. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonRise.7650 Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 (edited) Potentially locking players or guilds by inflating transfer costs, to dead or overstacked hosts and/or links, especially early on after a Relink cycle, is a terrible idea. They could dynamically adjust the populations more frequently and accurately, but with the current Population and linking system, it's most likely almost impossible to do. There's at least the odd occasions, where they change the population thresholds, every other Monday or Tuesday. It's something they should be working on with the Alliances, according to what they've said in their some forum posts and articles afaik. Edited May 9, 2022 by CrimsonNeonite.1048 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exeggcuter.8394 Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 Alternately, we as the players, could do our part by simply boycotting transferring altogether. If we want this to change, we can't give ANet a reason to keep it as it is. If more people simply refused to transfer at all, they wouldn't get their precious $$ from this lame system. Then they might have to change it to something else. For example, I kind of like the idea of ANet making it blatantly pay to win, but to raise the price to an absolutely outrageous sum. The price of gems themselves are dynamically adjusted fairly fast, they could easily do the same with WvW transfers. You really want to be in the highest pop server? That'd be 80,000 gems please! It just has to also be that servers are never ever fully blocked. It would also do a decent job of showing how badly stacked the servers actually are. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now