DrRockso.8593 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 With the way they are thinking about restructuring WvW, wouldn't make more since to call it Alliance Wars? Or Guild Wars? Or Alliance Battles. Kinda like we had in GW1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonSeed.3528 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Battle Royale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Guilds at war. =pwar of the guildsfaction wars or war of factionsheheking of the hill@DemonSeed.3528 said:Battle Royalei like this.@Izanagi.7831 said:With the way they are thinking about restructuring WvW, wouldn't make more since to call it Alliance Wars? Or Guild Wars? Or Alliance Battles. Kinda like we had in GW1?i like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaba.5410 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 How about "The Mist War"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirlias.8104 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Train wars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justine.6351 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Setting up alliances and doing some restructuring of wvw at same time could be renamed to alliance something. But the real risk is too many changes all at once killing the mode completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Haired Savage.5430 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 I'm guessing it'll be similar to the SPvP team names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @DemonSeed.3528 said:Battle RoyaleThat's what the French call combat with cheeze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 I think it makes a lot of sense to change the name of the game mode as part of restructuring. My favorites from the list above (so far) are:Alliance Wars (from @Izanagi.7831)The Mist War (from @Chaba.5410)And brainstorming a few more:Unstructured Players vs Players (uPvP, or uP for short)Realm vs RealmWar of the Roses (because it's a fun, evocative name)Red versus Green versus Blue (RGB) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenesisII.1540 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 It's still going to be world vs world...Alliances will be a small part of the population... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrequentia.3465 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 it wasn't called SvS ( server vs Server vs Server) before the restructure why would it change now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost.5637 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 just Guild Wars fits imo, or like Alliance At War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogrey.3891 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 mist war makes sense. or even battle for the mists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @"XenesisII.1540" said:It's still going to be world vs world...There aren't going to be any "worlds" after the restructuring. It makes sense for the name to change to fit the circumstances.(I'm okay if they don't change the name, too.)Alliances will be a small part of the population...I think it's more likely that alliances will be at least a plurality:Individualists, without a WvW-related guildUnallied non-WvW GuildsUnallied WvW GuildsAllied GuildsI think the first two groups will be the "small part" of the population. There will certainly be lots and lots of WvW Guilds that aren't part of alliances, but I think there will be far more people in the WvW guilds that are part of an alliance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenesisII.1540 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 There are going to be worlds, not servers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawdler.8521 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @XenesisII.1540 said:There are going to be worlds, not servers.Which means it will quite literally be World vs World vs World. Imagine that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korgov.7645 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Since the worlds won't be permanent let's call it Temporary World vs Temporary World vs Temporary World. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaba.5410 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @"Illconceived Was Na.9781"Look! It is amazing! Anet already implemented the name I suggested! Huzzah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetoII.3782 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Wasted time on rebranding <,<This is what you'd ask of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawdler.8521 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @Korgov.7645 said:Since the worlds won't be permanent let's call it Temporary World vs Temporary World vs Temporary World. :pBy this logic you where on a temporary server even if you stayed there for 6 years. People move all the time, it doesnt make servers temporary does it? Even a 0 population world is still a world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirlias.8104 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 The realm of flying golems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabari.7026 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 well in gw1 you had something called Alliance Battle (AB), WvW prob has it's roots from there, so think that name would fit WvW.https://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Alliance_Battles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @LetoII.3782 said:Wasted time on rebranding <,<This is what you'd ask of themThey are revamping the entire mechanic of how sides are created and matches determined. Rebranding fits in as part of that same effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenesisII.1540 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 It got it's roots from dark age of camelot realm vs realm system, which had 3 separate sides/realms in battle that took place on the same server/shard/world.The alliance battle of gw1 had 3 parties of 4 players together in a battle of 2 sides, amounts to like squad vs squad battle.Gw2 has entire server/world vs server/worlds vs server/world, the alliance system will still have entire world vs world vs world.The alliance system is just going to form parties of guilds(instead of looking at it as players) to be placed together on world creation, somehow people think this is all wvw is going to be about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korgov.7645 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 @Dawdler.8521 said:@Korgov.7645 said:Since the worlds won't be permanent let's call it Temporary World vs Temporary World vs Temporary World. :pBy this logic you where on a temporary server even if you stayed there for 6 years. People move all the time, it doesnt make servers temporary does it? Even a 0 population world is still a world.The world I started on is still here. Albeit it has become a guest world with no identity left and nothing to gain nor lose in WvW.Come the alliance system all worlds become guest worlds with no identity and nothing to fight for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.