Jump to content
  • Sign Up

kharmin.7683

Members
  • Posts

    10,267
  • Joined

Everything posted by kharmin.7683

  1. I don't see an inflation problem. Could you be more specific? As for 250 (or "stacks") of things, they accumulate quite easily by playing the game. Hoarding really has nothing to do with it. Again, is this about mystic coins?
  2. I think that it would be far easier to add a mastery to the Skimmer for this rather than creating a new mount from scratch.
  3. Seems like a veiled attempt to get players to spend/sell their mystic coins instead of holding them.
  4. I thought that the newer backpacks were designed with dye channels whereas the older ones weren't?
  5. I would expect the same time as all of the other updates.
  6. You won't get an official answer here. Best to submit a ticket to Support and they can pass it along.
  7. There have been previous threads with this request. It is not likely to happen.
  8. Ok, so how do I lose GW2 and how does another player beat me to win the game?
  9. Of course, they could spend resources (time, money, etc) to balancing and/or patching old zones, but then the game would not show any forward progress. Even more people would complain that the game is dead without new maps, rewards and such. Anet doesn't seem to have the resources available to move the game forward with expansions and still re-visit older zones.
  10. It's not about obliterating the economy. It's about sound business decisions. I trust Anet to make those decisions that will best serve to keep the game running over anyone on the forums. If it would make Anet more money to give away free stuff once every month, I'm sure that they would be doing so.
  11. Or, you could support Anet by purchasing gems. Sorry, but you won't get much sympathy here asking for yet more free stuff.
  12. Players will tend to migrate where the time/reward ratio is most favorable. With Anet continuing to expand the realm, certain maps will suffer lower population at times than others as players spread out. I'm sure if there were an answer to this, it would have been put into place by now.
  13. I can't understand how a company could give something away for free that would incentivize its customers to then spend money. Also, gems in the game are purchased by players, not injected into the store by Anet. A proposal like this would inflate the in-game economy. Hard pass.
  14. Well, if not, it could potentially be a mastery for the skimmer instead of an entirely new mount.
  15. Or masteries for this with the existing skimmer. Aren't there swim speed infusions already? Do they affect the skimmer's speed?
  16. One problem that I see with increasing the rewards is that those players who do the complete story X number of times would then do the story X number of times and then complain about that level of rewards not being enough and we'd be back to where we are now.
  17. So, you would eliminate ANet's biggest income generator and replace it with 9 month's worth of delay for 1 armor set to be released? Not sure that fits the business plan. As much as many complain about the quality and/or selection of items in the gem store, ANet has to bring in some cash to keep the game running.
  18. There is nothing preventing you from playing as you like what you like. They're just moving the rewards around. Your home analogy is flawed. You can still do fractals.
  19. Heh. Doubtful, since it seems that Anet wants to focus on strikes with the announced changes to fractal rewards.
  20. I wonder if this is a move to get development resources away from fractals and into strikes so that Anet need only produce one type of content rather than two?
×
×
  • Create New...