kharmin.7683

Alt+1 Build Template AAlt+2 Equipment Template AAlt+3 Build Template BAlt+4 Equipment Template BAlt+5 Build Template CAlt+6 Equipment Template C Shift+1 RaptorShift+2 SpringerShift+3 SkimmerShift+4 JackalShift+5 GriffonShift+6 SkyscaleShift+7 Roller BeetleShift+8 Warclaw Not a one-button solution, but I've found it easy enough for me. /shrug

From the GW2 User Agreement:--- start paste ---You acknowledge, and further agree, that You have no IP right related to any Account ID, any Account Display Name, any ArenaNet Message Board ID, any communication or information on any ArenaNet Message Board provided by You or anyone else, any information, feedback or communication related to the Game, any Character ID or characteristics related to a Character ID, any combination of the foregoing or parts thereof, or any combination of the foregoing with any Service, Content, Game, or parts thereof.--- end paste --- Would it be generous and a good faith act for Anet to "give" something to the player who brought something like this to production? Sure, but they are certainly not obligated to do so, nor is it plagiarism.

There is also this thing from the gem store: https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/World_Boss_Portal_Device

I think so too.i think the dmg from mounts can be near 0 in central tyria. The game was very easy playable without mount, and player should learn their class there not how to kill stuff with a raptor tail.But veteran players already know their classes. Why should they not benefit from the dismount skill? I don't think that nerfing damage down to 0 from mounts is the right answer.

Yes, alternatives like this might be incentives and not requirements, but that was not what the OP was saying which is why I only responded to the very first point.

Entitled? How? Please explain, because I really don't get it. Nothing in what you said indicated a sense of entitlement. This is just another example of someone throwing around a catchphrase without really understanding it. Like the word ‘forced’. ?I don't know what else to call it when the OP wants Anet to add "incentives" for content with which players aren't engaging enough for the OP. If players want the additional "incentive", they would then be forced to do the content. I can't make this point any more clear. If some can't wrap their mind around it, then I can't do anything more.

Since we're only guessing here, why is mine the one people gang up on? Not what you like to here is my guess. Still, my guess isn't going turn a guess into reality any more than anyone elses. Well you do say its more likely then any of the other claims, so what proof you got that your guess is more valid then the others mate? Nothing, which shouldn't surprise anybody. When we all start providing inside knowledge to anets decisions, we'll all be working there.That, imo, could only improve matters. ;)

Entitled? How? Please explain, because I really don't get it.

why would you be against one of the core guild wars 1 races? Especially when they are a key example of tyrian fantasy(charr, asura, sylvari, etc) where they try to break away from the generic fantasy tropes. Because I don't like tengu.

Which is also why I expounded on the idea. Incentivizing would be making a mode easier for some things to be acquired, and harder in others. But still be able to be acquired in your preferred mode. Right, but in the context of the original post, I felt the suggestion would force players into content which was my point. That's why I disagreed with your statement. /shrug Right, except you removed the whole point of my post in your disagreement. /shrug.I only wanted to react to that one statement.

Which is also why I expounded on the idea. Incentivizing would be making a mode easier for some things to be acquired, and harder in others. But still be able to be acquired in your preferred mode. Right, but in the context of the original post, I felt the suggestion would force players into content which was my point. That's why I disagreed with your statement. /shrug

If any "factions" happen, I hope that they don't prevent the ability to complete content because a player chooses one faction over another. The only way I would want to see factions implemented would be in some WvW capacity, which would be unattached to anything OWPvE.

If you have Mystic Forge Stones you can use them to make a Mystic Salvage Kit, which has 250 uses. I make them with stones from login rewards and I find them much more convenient than the default kits. One day I might get one of the permanent ones, but as long as I've got mystic forge stones to use up I don't see the need. Yeah, I do this, too especially for the Mystic Forger daily.

I hope that it's not personal housing and fishing. If those are the main draws of the expansion, then I will be quite disappointed.

Please, not another thread asking Anet to force players to do content that they prefer not to do. There are several, diverse types of content in GW2, none of which is hidden from players. If someone wants to play some, or all, of the content, then that is their choice. The game (and studio) shouldn't force it.

DELETED. Whoops.

I believe that with the megaserver, map population is too dynamic.

I fail to understand what purpose this proposal would serve.

Are mystic coins so difficult to obtain, I mean in comparison to these infusions?