NA links are totally unbalanced. — Guild Wars 2 Forums

NA links are totally unbalanced.

SnowPumpkin.1809SnowPumpkin.1809 Member ✭✭
edited January 9, 2019 in WvW

Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are even more unbalanced with the links since the last re-linking?

<1

Comments

  • Bigpapasmurf.5623Bigpapasmurf.5623 Member ✭✭✭✭

    matchupthread

    inb4

    T1problems

    Red = Dead...or someone runs away. Either way it's gone.
    twitch.tv/TRMC
    Lover of Jumping puzzles, Squirrels, WvW, and Taimi
    Co-Leader of SOmething inAPpropriate {SOAP}

  • Strider Pj.2193Strider Pj.2193 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

  • oOStaticOo.9467oOStaticOo.9467 Member ✭✭✭

    Linking is not the problem. Transfers are the problem. Anet should lock servers and not allow for transfers. People just overstack servers so that they can win.

  • Spartacus.3192Spartacus.3192 Member ✭✭✭

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    I'm in BG and i wish we didn't have a link. We actually have queues now which is annoying AF.

  • RisenHowl.2419RisenHowl.2419 Member ✭✭✭

    T2 isn't any better

  • SnowPumpkin.1809SnowPumpkin.1809 Member ✭✭
    edited January 9, 2019

    @oOStaticOo.9467 said:
    Linking is not the problem. Transfers are the problem. Anet should lock servers and not allow for transfers. People just overstack servers so that they can win.

    I agree this is a problem as well. But that's how they get people to transfer to the smaller servers. Problem is they don't stay they just follow the winning servers link around lol. T1 was doing a bit better until these recent links and most likely a ton of transfers to the BG link. Also, Strider I wouldn't call it salt, have you looked at T1 NA scores lately? That isn't just a small lead.

  • Strider Pj.2193Strider Pj.2193 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:

    @oOStaticOo.9467 said:
    Linking is not the problem. Transfers are the problem. Anet should lock servers and not allow for transfers. People just overstack servers so that they can win.

    I agree this is a problem as well. But that's how they get people to transfer to the smaller servers. Problem is they don't stay they just follow the winning servers link around lol. T1 was doing a bit better until these recent links and most likely a ton of transfers to the BG link. Also, Strider I wouldn't call it salt, have you looked at T1 NA scores lately? That isn't just a small lead.

    Yes. Where were you last week? There were more on BG.

    Where were you when Kaineng and SOR popped up again?

    The AR link to a lesser degree?

    This is not new, nor is it going away. In 8 weeks, maybe ET will become a host only to find itself in T4 until becoming a link server again.

    People ARE salty because it’s that BG got a link. YOU may not be, but I didn’t note YOU were.

  • @Spartacus.3192 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    I'm in BG and i wish we didn't have a link. We actually have queues now which is annoying AF.

    Really? Cause I was on my ET account the other night and could barely find anyone. Plus all our stuff was paper. I tend to play very late at night, but I thought BG had wall to wall coverage.

  • crepuscular.9047crepuscular.9047 Member ✭✭✭✭

    yeah, world transfer is the issue, not actually the linking

    i'm on SoS, a lot of the hardcore WvW squad leads i had added over the past years i see them on borderlands not matching SoS's matchups.

    [RIP Fashion Wars 2005-2018]     [TTS] [KA] [SI]     [RIP Fashion Wars 2005-2018]
    Praise the Inevitable Eternal Transcendent King Palawa Ignacious Joko, the Beloved and Feared Undying Eternal Monarch of All !!!
    ... til Aurene ate him for dessert 😭
  • Limodriver.4106Limodriver.4106 Member ✭✭✭

    I am not leaving BG link why would anyone leave for lower tier server makes no sense.

  • Klipso.8653Klipso.8653 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @XatraZaytrax.2601 said:

    @Spartacus.3192 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    I'm in BG and i wish we didn't have a link. We actually have queues now which is annoying AF.

    Really? Cause I was on my ET account the other night and could barely find anyone. Plus all our stuff was paper. I tend to play very late at night, but I thought BG had wall to wall coverage.

    According to the forums we do. But in game, not for a few years now.

    -Balwarc [ICoa]

  • Kylden Ar.3724Kylden Ar.3724 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Lock for matchup topic in 5... 4...

    How many times we gotta tell you GRIND IS NOT CONTENT there ANet?

    Leader of Tyrian Adventure Corp [TACO], [RaW][TACO] Alliance, Kaineng.

  • Sleepwalker.1398Sleepwalker.1398 Member ✭✭✭
    edited January 10, 2019

    @XatraZaytrax.2601 said:

    Really? Cause I was on my ET account the other night and could barely find anyone. Plus all our stuff was paper. I tend to play very late at night, but I thought BG had wall to wall coverage.

    Timezone here: https://wvwstats.com/timezones

  • morrolan.9608morrolan.9608 Member ✭✭✭

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    And justifiably so looking at the scores.

  • Strider Pj.2193Strider Pj.2193 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @morrolan.9608 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    And justifiably so looking at the scores.

    Yes, because snapshots in time are completely accurate.

  • Spartacus.3192Spartacus.3192 Member ✭✭✭

    @XatraZaytrax.2601 said:

    @Spartacus.3192 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    I'm in BG and i wish we didn't have a link. We actually have queues now which is annoying AF.

    Really? Cause I was on my ET account the other night and could barely find anyone. Plus all our stuff was paper. I tend to play very late at night, but I thought BG had wall to wall coverage.

    With new Living World Episode out a lot of people may be doing PVE. However since the link ive noticed a lot of tags on EBG. At reset last friday the queue for EBG was at 50, 30 seconds after reset and stayed like that for the next few hours. I also noticed that TAGs seem to prefer to snowball a map. I have a lot of the BG and some of the ET tags on my friend list and when i check to see where they are, the majority of them are all on the same map. This results in only 1 maybe 2 maps queued and the others empty. This was not the case before the link.

  • funny ppl just keep complaining about BG but they dont realize all BG do is have few ppl running around capping stuff on BL while all the other server ppl just want to AFK EB and SM.

  • LetoII.3782LetoII.3782 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @morrolan.9608 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    And justifiably so looking at the scores.

    Yes, because snapshots in time are completely accurate.

    Snapshots take 24 hours?

    [HUNT] the predatory instinct

  • SkyShroud.2865SkyShroud.2865 Member ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 10, 2019

    Alliance will still take another year, assuming they even doing it.
    The population balance with that much frequent transferring is already in complete mess.
    Game mode will remain in such a mess until they put a bigger penalty on it.

    Founder & Leader of Equinox Solstice [TIME], a Singapore-Based International PvX Guild
    Henge of Denravi Server
    www.gw2time.com

    --

    Explanations of WvW Structures & Populations Issues

  • Strider Pj.2193Strider Pj.2193 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @LetoII.3782 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @morrolan.9608 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    And justifiably so looking at the scores.

    Yes, because snapshots in time are completely accurate.

    Snapshots take 24 hours?

    It’s a long exposure photograph. :tongue:

  • Shadow Order.7258Shadow Order.7258 Member ✭✭✭
    edited January 10, 2019

    It won't be addressed anytime soon. The kitten alliances moving around are a cash cow for Anet. As for alliances I expect Anet to keep this in their back pocket and release it when Camelot Unchained or another threat rears it's ugly head.

    As long as the bads continue to fund my pve I'll tolerate kitten match ups.

  • morrolan.9608morrolan.9608 Member ✭✭✭

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @morrolan.9608 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    And justifiably so looking at the scores.

    Yes, because snapshots in time are completely accurate.

    What snapshot in time? I'm talking about since the relink happened.

  • Strider Pj.2193Strider Pj.2193 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @morrolan.9608 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @morrolan.9608 said:

    @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    @SnowPumpkin.1809 said:
    Who else on NA in T1 agrees that things are extremely unbalanced with the links right now?

    ‘Right now’? I think that has existed in t-1 since link bandwagoning for ‘alliance practice’ started.

    People are mostly salty because BG got a link. Period.

    And justifiably so looking at the scores.

    Yes, because snapshots in time are completely accurate.

    What snapshot in time? I'm talking about since the relink happened.

    Two weeks.. out of over 2 years of links. BG has had a link for a total of 10 weeks. The first linked period and the last two weeks. Deep breath. It’s OK. The world isn’t gonna end.

    In 6 weeks ET will become a host for 8 weeks until this group bandwagons elsewhere.

    People are only this salty because BG.

    People were quiet when it happened with Kaineng, with SoR, and to a lesser extent AR.

    But hey, the last 16 weeks didn’t show that at all..,

  • Voltekka.2375Voltekka.2375 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Eu T1 isnt faring any better,mind you. And people i know either dont play wvw as much as they used to, or quit it. Some also left for other servers. So, its not just NA.

  • @Strider Pj.2193 said:

    Two weeks.. out of over 2 years of links. BG has had a link for a total of 10 weeks. The first linked period and the last two weeks. Deep breath. It’s OK. The world isn’t gonna end.

    In 6 weeks ET will become a host for 8 weeks until this group bandwagons elsewhere.

    People are only this salty because BG.

    People were quiet when it happened with Kaineng, with SoR, and to a lesser extent AR.

    But hey, the last 16 weeks didn’t show that at all..,

    Sorry to burst anyone's bubble thinking of moving to ET, but i think i saw VR has moved to FC linked to YB.
    But i don't think VR takes pug with them when they attack a keep or tower, they just too large a group.

  • shiri.4257shiri.4257 Member ✭✭✭
    edited January 11, 2019

    BG is the greatest community ever. Bow down to its greatness! Always outmanned, but never outgunned!

    Spectre [VII] - Wood League Champion. Making "fight guilds" stack on higher tiers since 2013.
    Wood League News Network [WLNN]- www.twitch.tv/shirirx

  • X T D.6458X T D.6458 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @shiri.4257 said:
    BG is the greatest community ever. Bow down to its greatness! Always outmanned, but never outgunned!

    Thank you for your thoughts and prayers in these uncertain times with everything going on in the world.

    BG

  • @Kunzaito.8169 said:
    There is definitely a problem. I know about the previous bandwagon juggernauts, but I don't really know whether or not there was some semblance of competition those weeks on T1, someone else will have to answer that. For my part I can only answer about the last two weeks.

    BG has won every single skirmish except for ONE the past two weeks, and during that one skirmish we had a truce with YB's commander to doubleteam BG everywhere because we were both so sick of being trained down every single place we went. Usually their PPT is DOUBLE the other two servers. They held T3 keeps and towers on both enemy BLs, their entire BL T3, and SMC T3 almost the entire time. They have the numbers to respond to any and every attack with force any time of day. To the people claiming they are able to do this with a skeleton crew, I call shenanigans. You can't hold that many objectives without numbers, it's just not possible. Not to mention I have played throughout the day and been blobbed down in many failed assaults during all the coverage zones. You simply can't take something from them that they don't want to let you have.

    Yeah, maybe some people are a bit upset that it's BG specifically, but I think more people are just frustrated because 1. how did ANet not know this would happen given BG's rep as a WvW server? And 2. it's just not fun to play against this. It's basically a 1v1 for red and blue, and whichever side BG chooses not to focus will get stuck playing in T1 for another week. Other servers don't want to be there, they try to tank to get out. I seriously don't know how anyone on BG finds this fun, it seems like it would be boring but 6 years of WvW has emphatically proven me to be in the minority on this point.

    And that's basically the key - the top tier of competition is utterly, completely boring. You can't roam and find smallscale stuff, if you have a little group fighting on an objective somewhere their numbers multiply and the fun's over, you can't hit anything and have a reasonable chance to take it, so the die-hards just bunker their back towers in ebg and wait for the blob to come or not. It's not healthy for the game. Probably ANet doesn't have any short-term answer that wouldn't cause additional problems so they're banking on alliances. All I can say is, the sooner the better.

    Really ...i found lots of fun with Bg ..at least not endless doors and NPC .The game isnt balanced never will be,whatever strange system introduce .Personally alliances sounds like the prelude to boredom to me .So they have numbers they win so what ? ..someone has too..You die so what its painless and back is easy .They are a magnet for some again so what dont appeal to me ..These last weeks with BG have been fun end of story .And yes on TC always have never changed server.and found lots to do from blobby to roaming these last weeks.

  • Teikoku.2068Teikoku.2068 Member ✭✭
    edited January 12, 2019

    OG BG since the old days!

    Leaving this here for you all <3

    Edit: Also please tell us how many of those guild tags you see in WvW nowadays on BG?

  • @Teikoku.2068 said:
    OG BG since the old days!

    Leaving this here for you all <3

    Edit: Also please tell us how many of those guild tags you see in WvW nowadays on BG?

    3
    Icoa, Revel (they are now ME Mystbound Eternals) and a few SG still popping around.

  • @Kunzaito.8169 said:
    And that's basically the key - the top tier of competition is utterly, completely boring. You can't roam and find smallscale stuff, if you have a little group fighting on an objective somewhere their numbers multiply and the fun's over, you can't hit anything and have a reasonable chance to take it, so the die-hards just bunker their back towers in ebg and wait for the blob to come or not. It's not healthy for the game. Probably ANet doesn't have any short-term answer that wouldn't cause additional problems so they're banking on alliances. All I can say is, the sooner the better.

    Alliances are not some magical panacea, in one of their latest updates the dev said they won't balance timezones, at least initially. This is something that people have rightfully complained about since day 1 of launch. We're 6 years in and no attempts have been made to solve it yet.

    P.S. the game is not healthy for the game. There's a reason why ANet themselves stated that less people played wvw after every single tournament.

  • Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    Ferguson's Crossing Server Leader

    WVW LEADER

    VR

  • Jeknar.6184Jeknar.6184 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @hunkamania.7561 said:
    Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    But isn't that what EotM is?

    Ferguson's Crossing Mithril Squire (Rank 5001) - PvP Phoenix (Rank 72) - 30k Achievement Points
    Exalted Kawagima, Calamis Fatima, Hanna Flintlocke, Suzuhara Suzuka, Sally Furious Ant, Sabetha Deadeye, Bjarl of Souls, Lilian Mistwalker, Kelvena Riverstream, Zallha Wildhunt

  • hunkamania.7561hunkamania.7561 Member ✭✭✭
    edited January 14, 2019

    @Jeknar.6184 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:
    Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    But isn't that what EotM is?

    no1 plays eotm cause the map is bad and no pips(it's died since pips use to be popping). if they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw for 1 week you'd be surprised of the results and positive feedback but i doubt it ever happens since wvw has 1 poor dev doing everything.

    Ferguson's Crossing Server Leader

    WVW LEADER

    VR

  • Nimon.7840Nimon.7840 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Voltekka.2375 said:
    Eu T1 isnt faring any better,mind you. And people i know either dont play wvw as much as they used to, or quit it. Some also left for other servers. So, its not just NA.

    Gets especially worse if you compare higher tier servers to lower tier servers. The population is so hard unbalanced,... You can't get into higher tiers even if you want to, if you don't even get queue on even one map at reset/primetime

  • Strider Pj.2193Strider Pj.2193 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Stand The Wall.6987 said:
    the only way to balance na wvw is to have 3 mega servers, period.

    Sure. With no control over going with squads or guilds. Random assignment. See how long people enjoy that.

  • @Stand The Wall.6987 said:
    the only way to balance na wvw is to have 3 mega servers, period.

    lol... they called that Edge of the Mists. It looked like wvw but wasn't. At best a change like that would send every true wvw player out of that mode permanently. I most definitely would retire before I hit that 4k mark I've been edging closer to since other than a handful of times I didn't play in EOTM.

    Just another WvW lifer who'll never say die... while dying again and again!

  • @hunkamania.7561 said:

    @Jeknar.6184 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:
    Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    But isn't that what EotM is?

    no1 plays eotm cause the map is bad and no pips(it's died since pips use to be popping). if they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw for 1 week you'd be surprised of the results and positive feedback but i doubt it ever happens since wvw has 1 poor dev doing everything.

    If they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw ever I would stop playing immediately. I'd rather queue than wind up in a different instance than my server mates. eotm2 definitely would not work in any way good to solve the current problems.

    Just another WvW lifer who'll never say die... while dying again and again!

  • Diku.2546Diku.2546 Member ✭✭✭
    edited January 14, 2019

    @Bigpapasmurf.5623 said:
    Snip 8<
    Snip 8<

    T1problems


    Yes, I agree with you...there's problems with T1.

    Funny part about this...

    What really needs fixing IS our Match-Up model (Fixed 3 Way in Tiers), but folks keep insisting that we need to fix our Team Creation mechanic to make WvW better.

    Server Linking showed us how successful having a better Team Creation was at improving WvW.

    Opinions vary...so use your own observation to form your own opinion on HOW SUCCESSFUL.

    Our current WvW Match-Up model just encourages the 800 pound Gorilla in the Room scenario, but we're ALL hell bent on making sure the we counter this by manually or randomly Re-Creating Teams?

    Can we...Change or Replace our current Match-Up design model with something else that can Directly Fix things...so we Can Have Healthy Competitive Weekly Match-Ups instead?

    Nobody wants to be stuck Month after Month in a Fixed 3 Way Fight with a 800 pound Gorilla in the Room...unless you're on the Team that's the Gorilla.

    Hahaha...MatchUp Snip 8<

    Let's just all get along. :)

  • phokus.8934phokus.8934 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Stand The Wall.6987 said:
    the only way to balance na wvw is to have 3 mega servers, period.

    With one battleground the size of Tyria. Minimal waypoints, restricted use of mounts, and bam, wvw back on the map again.

  • Grim West.3194Grim West.3194 Member ✭✭✭

    ANET created this garbage. It's all on them.

  • Jerry CCH.9816Jerry CCH.9816 Member ✭✭✭

    All of you guys like angry birds and no sense. B)

    No one want Anet Nerf EBG T3 SMC or do anything change at WvW stuff " Isn't?
    You guys like T3 smc ?? that's cancer with sieges

  • Ni In.6578Ni In.6578 Member ✭✭✭

    T3 SMC properly sieged is a challenge. Breaking and farming in is the reward.

    [VII] Spectre Legacy - Declared Best NA Guild by Grimaldi
    Crystal Desert Consul Member and President of Scrubs; declared most toxic server NA by Z E Y
    [VII] wants fights! Please bring your pug rangers for UD progress.

  • @Balthazzarr.1349 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:

    @Jeknar.6184 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:
    Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    But isn't that what EotM is?

    no1 plays eotm cause the map is bad and no pips(it's died since pips use to be popping). if they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw for 1 week you'd be surprised of the results and positive feedback but i doubt it ever happens since wvw has 1 poor dev doing everything.

    If they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw ever I would stop playing immediately. I'd rather queue than wind up in a different instance than my server mates. eotm2 definitely would not work in any way good to solve the current problems.

    So you'd rather wvw be dead and unbalanced? Fantastic.

    Ferguson's Crossing Server Leader

    WVW LEADER

    VR

  • @hunkamania.7561 said:

    @Balthazzarr.1349 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:

    @Jeknar.6184 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:
    Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    But isn't that what EotM is?

    no1 plays eotm cause the map is bad and no pips(it's died since pips use to be popping). if they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw for 1 week you'd be surprised of the results and positive feedback but i doubt it ever happens since wvw has 1 poor dev doing everything.

    If they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw ever I would stop playing immediately. I'd rather queue than wind up in a different instance than my server mates. eotm2 definitely would not work in any way good to solve the current problems.

    So you'd rather wvw be dead and unbalanced? Fantastic.

    There is no balance in eotm. It's not true wvw and doesn't reflect what the whole rvr is all about. Yes, I would stop playing if they turned wvw into megaservers.

    Just another WvW lifer who'll never say die... while dying again and again!

  • @Balthazzarr.1349 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:

    @Balthazzarr.1349 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:

    @Jeknar.6184 said:

    @hunkamania.7561 said:
    Overflow is the only real way to balance the game 24/7 and have a steady group of people on every realm. Servers and alliances just won't cut it. Not many other options.

    But isn't that what EotM is?

    no1 plays eotm cause the map is bad and no pips(it's died since pips use to be popping). if they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw for 1 week you'd be surprised of the results and positive feedback but i doubt it ever happens since wvw has 1 poor dev doing everything.

    If they tried the eotm overflow system in wvw ever I would stop playing immediately. I'd rather queue than wind up in a different instance than my server mates. eotm2 definitely would not work in any way good to solve the current problems.

    So you'd rather wvw be dead and unbalanced? Fantastic.

    There is no balance in eotm. It's not true wvw and doesn't reflect what the whole rvr is all about. Yes, I would stop playing if they turned wvw into megaservers.

    where all players have guys 24/7 isn't balance? there's a reason PVE went mega servers cause there would be too many dead zones just like there is in wvw. Server system is bad and it's been bad for years. Only time it worked was when the game had a mega population but once that dies down it doesn't work anymore.

    Ferguson's Crossing Server Leader

    WVW LEADER

    VR

©2010–2018 ArenaNet, LLC. All rights reserved. Guild Wars, Guild Wars 2, Heart of Thorns, Guild Wars 2: Path of Fire, ArenaNet, NCSOFT, the Interlocking NC Logo, and all associated logos and designs are trademarks or registered trademarks of NCSOFT Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.