Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 5, 2020 Share Posted January 5, 2020 Would like a 36 vs 36 Queued SPvP game mode with a combo of objectives (Circles, NPC lords, Flag running) all in one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidrex.5649 Posted January 5, 2020 Share Posted January 5, 2020 devs cant handle 5v5 AT, what makes you thinkt they could handle 36v36? or better yet, to find 72 players to play it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeikeNz.3526 Posted January 5, 2020 Share Posted January 5, 2020 thats called WvW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 6, 2020 Author Share Posted January 6, 2020 @Leonidrex.5649 said:devs cant handle 5v5 AT, what makes you thinkt they could handle 36v36? or better yet, to find 72 players to play it lol32 vs 32 is more easier to balance than 5v5. thats why. otherwise they would have 1v1s instead of 5v5s right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 6, 2020 Author Share Posted January 6, 2020 @SeikeNz.3526 said:thats called WvWlast I checked WvW didnt have balanced team fights in instances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto.5684 Posted January 6, 2020 Share Posted January 6, 2020 No. That would be an aoe slug fest. And is not that WvW is all about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swagger.1459 Posted January 6, 2020 Share Posted January 6, 2020 @Knighthonor.4061 said:Would like a 36 vs 36 Queued SPvP game mode with a combo of objectives (Circles, NPC lords, Flag running) all in one. Didn’t you mention before that wow had battle grounds? Maybe you should try that! You can always play both games! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 6, 2020 Author Share Posted January 6, 2020 @Swagger.1459 said:@Knighthonor.4061 said:Would like a 36 vs 36 Queued SPvP game mode with a combo of objectives (Circles, NPC lords, Flag running) all in one. Didn’t you mention before that wow had battle grounds? Maybe you should try that! You can always play both games! WoW also had 5v5 Arenas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Boyer.6524 Posted January 6, 2020 Share Posted January 6, 2020 Terrible suggestion, no offense.Blob metas are BORING my dude, so boring. Please god no.Upon that, the lag issues are getting real nowadays. Just absolutely no to 30+ vs. 30+ blob wars.Now if you're talking a map as large as EBG, that was a 30 man FFA, ok. That might actually turn out well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatar.3568 Posted January 6, 2020 Share Posted January 6, 2020 @Knighthonor.4061 said:@Leonidrex.5649 said:devs cant handle 5v5 AT, what makes you thinkt they could handle 36v36? or better yet, to find 72 players to play it lol32 vs 32 is more easier to balance than 5v5. thats why. otherwise they would have 1v1s instead of 5v5s right? no its 5vs5 because its the game mode that was released with the game if they had released a 3vs3 or 1vs1 at release it would be the only mod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugrakarma.9416 Posted January 6, 2020 Share Posted January 6, 2020 i like Blob wars, but in current game mechanics arent so good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 6, 2020 Author Share Posted January 6, 2020 @Avatar.3568 said:@Knighthonor.4061 said:@Leonidrex.5649 said:devs cant handle 5v5 AT, what makes you thinkt they could handle 36v36? or better yet, to find 72 players to play it lol32 vs 32 is more easier to balance than 5v5. thats why. otherwise they would have 1v1s instead of 5v5s right? no its 5vs5 because its the game mode that was released with the game if they had released a 3vs3 or 1vs1 at release it would be the only modAnd those would have been even more unbalanced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutOfOrder.3719 Posted January 6, 2020 Share Posted January 6, 2020 Let’s be reasonable with PvP requests. The fact ANET is working on a potential 15vs15 is really surprising. 36vs36 already exists in WvW .I would be extremely happy with a dedicated team ladder for actual Guild Wars incorporating 5vs5 or 10vs10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swagger.1459 Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 @Knighthonor.4061 said:@Swagger.1459 said:@Knighthonor.4061 said:Would like a 36 vs 36 Queued SPvP game mode with a combo of objectives (Circles, NPC lords, Flag running) all in one. Didn’t you mention before that wow had battle grounds? Maybe you should try that! You can always play both games! WoW also had 5v5 Arenas. U can totally play WoW 2 then! Enjoy it there bc we r not gettin it here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeteCommander.4937 Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 1 vs 1. please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tharan.9085 Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Imagine thinking there are enough people for this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lare.5129 Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 welcome to wvw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luthan.5236 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Too much. Most games I played (though they were more shooter-like or real shooter games) have about 10-20 players per team which feels great. Anything more than 20 ... especially here in a MMORPG ... would feel bad. 10-20 players each team + it would need a huge map and options to strategize as as well. Thats what would sound nice. Also nice special mechanics (like most maps already have atm) are nice to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 10, 2020 Author Share Posted January 10, 2020 @Luthan.5236 said:Too much. Most games I played (though they were more shooter-like or real shooter games) have about 10-20 players per team which feels great. Anything more than 20 ... especially here in a MMORPG ... would feel bad. 10-20 players each team + it would need a huge map and options to strategize as as well. Thats what would sound nice. Also nice special mechanics (like most maps already have atm) are nice to have.I disagree. I played a few different MMOs that were successful in larger instanced pvp. WoW may be the exception since it was the most populated MMO in Western history, but other smaller less popular MMOs also had good instanced Pvp that was 20v20 and up. And it wasn't FPS like at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luthan.5236 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 I agree with you on the queue thing in the other thread. (I would love to see some bigger team game modes with queue or hot join queue mechanig instead of the custom arena thing.)Really might depend on the maps/game mode ... the max size of players that would be fun. I have not played a lot yet in GW2 and I don't have many experience with other MMORPGs that have team matches PvP with bigger teams though. So I need to trust your info/experience on this.I'd love to have it non-zergy though. Atm some players even try to run into 1-3 ... or 3 players at one point ... running in big groups. Big map with 30-30 needs to be designt in a way that not all the 30 players are at one point. For example a mechanic that requires you to hold 2 different points (at opposite directions) to even start your point counter. (And maybe less points for player kills to prevent people just doing that.) A timer could still make it "easier" (having only 1 capture point to gain victory points) after a certain amount of time. (Mechanics named as "sudden death" - which could be different mechanics but preventing the game to drag on for too long ... besidse the normal timer already in the game.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kratan.4619 Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 This would just devolve into the same a zerg vs zerg in WvW. There would be too many "elitists" trying to dictate what class you can play. "Log off that damn ranger and get on your FB." Crap like this would happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZDragon.3046 Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 hmmmm... Gross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure The Heartless.3261 Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 mumbling about WvW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knighthonor.4061 Posted January 15, 2020 Author Share Posted January 15, 2020 @"kratan.4619" said:This would just devolve into the same a zerg vs zerg in WvW. There would be too many "elitists" trying to dictate what class you can play. "Log off that kitten ranger and get on your FB." kitten like this would happen.Zerg vs Zerg is only a problem when there is no objective, like in WvW.I would hope a 36 vs 36 match has many objectives with a goal to each, rather than just trading structures with no objective, like WvW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now