Jump to content
  • Sign Up

kharmin.7683

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,267

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kharmin.7683

  1. kharmin.7683
    Yeah, my emails go back at least before COVID with no response.
  2. kharmin.7683
    I think they ignore them. I've sent many emails there that have never had a response.
  3. kharmin.7683
    Wouldn't heroes defeat the purpose and meaning of Player versus Player ?
  4. kharmin.7683
    I use tiger for the F2 fury in melee. Guaranteed to not be meta though since I'm so very casual. Still, I like the synergy with Sw/D in melee with tiger. F2 for fury, unleash for sword ambush then swap back for F1-F3 skills on unleashed tiger. Repeat. /shrug Works for me.
  5. kharmin.7683
    So, that was you? haha!
  6. kharmin.7683
    I would prefer resources be spent elsewhere.
  7. kharmin.7683
    This, again? (sigh) https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/topic/92924-aviator-box-and-other-items-placed-under-chests-purposely-to-annoyprevent-players-from-looting/?do=findComment&comment=92923 https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/topic/25620-aviator-memory-boxes-in-treasure-chests/?do=findComment&comment=25619
  8. kharmin.7683
    Maybe some of these? https://www.guildwars2.com/en/media/videos/
  9. kharmin.7683
    I see my guildies' mail carriers when we're waiting on an event and they're selling things off.
  10. kharmin.7683
    It's not a simple request. In order to implement this suggestion, Anet would have to re-do all of the armors from scratch which would take years of work (we already know it takes around 9 months just to make ONE armor set). So, yeah, it may not be revolutionary, but it is certainly not a simple request.
  11. kharmin.7683
    That's a bit disingenuous, no? Didn't they just make banner changes that the Warrior subforum was calling for?
  12. kharmin.7683
    That is correct
  13. kharmin.7683
    Nothing to see here. Move along.
  14. kharmin.7683
    I believe that's exactly what they did.
  15. kharmin.7683
    No.
  16. kharmin.7683
    I agree in that this is entirely subjective. I don't think that makes it unethical. Also, in your movie example, the studio may have decided that it was in their best financial sense in the long run, to which I alluded earlier. None of us know what factored in to this decision by Anet. If it didn't make good financial or business sense, then I doubt that they would have made it.
  17. kharmin.7683
    I guess people are running out of various forms of "Legolas"
  18. kharmin.7683
    Same. Except, in many cases, I see a toon decked out in legendary gear and think, "Ugh, that's hideous."
  19. kharmin.7683
    Not sure that I agree about it being ethical or not. It being wrong to change something like this is subjective and I can understand why some people would be upset. However, it is a business decision that, as you point out, can only affect the financial bottom line. Anet has weighed the risks and decided that this particular change has more positive benefits to them in the long term.
  20. kharmin.7683
    As said above, this is entirely subjective.
  21. kharmin.7683
    This point has been repeated over many previous threads which the OP could have found very easily by using the forums search.
  22. kharmin.7683
    No.
  23. kharmin.7683
    Because your point was irrelevant. Anet (and by extension NCSoft if you want to go that route) owns it all. We only pay for a license to use it. Maybe read through the terms of service.
  24. kharmin.7683
    So, WvW without actually playing WvW, including the same rewards as if you were playing WvW?
  25. kharmin.7683
    But that's just it. No one has any rights to any content, purchased or otherwise. Anet can pull the plug on GW2 at any time, and no one would keep anything or get any "refund" for money spent over the years. You clearly do not understand how this model works.
GuildWars2.com
ArenaNet

©2020 ArenaNet, LLC. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

ESRB - Teen
×
×
  • Create New...