mindcircus.1506

Nope.... Also paid Josh Strife Hayes a bunch of money for a few minutes of him doing an ad that sounded as sincere as a Raid Shadow Legends spot. Now ask the real question:"What happened when Staysafe and Toweliee who were streaming the game for fun and passion found out Anet was paying other Streamers?" or "What was the impact of the partner program approaching dozens of sub-twenty viewer vtubers and offering them partner when people who had been streaming the game for months couldnt get the time of day from them?" Streaming support that means anything has to be organic.

Which they did prior to the EoD launch. Many many many of them.

The SSD overcomming the issue points more to a problem with @Veprovina.4876's system as if there is a ram issue and a slow hard drive. Interesting, thanks

I will give you ten ectos for it.

I get the it's a necro thread but I was curious if indeed the screenshot was taken on a PC that meets the MSR's, and you do frequent the forums currently. Where I used to work, putting up those graphics on a box that met MSR's would have been a real no-no so I was curious. Clearly that spot you screenshotted was far enough from the WP that the floor should have loaded, and unless there's another issue with your rig other than being a potato, something is up.

Honest Question:Does your PC meet the MSR for the game?

The damage data for everyone in the group/squad is already kept client side by all participants. The third party tool (in this case ARCdps) is only showing you data that you already have. All it does it display it in a readable format. But 10/10 forum legalese....ggwp.

It very much is on display already to any member of your squad/group. If it weren't ARC would not work.

The forum mob is confusey facing you but there is bug that is causing your issue.

still not Anets issue, chummer

Guild Claiming allows for upgrades to an objective and auras that are not available without the claim. https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Guild_Objective_Aura_VIII

If a player joins a group doesn't it become part of the team's data? If everyone is working towards a common goal, why should one member want to hide their contribution?

This is a problem to report to the makers of Action4, not Arenanet.

Time Pressure exists on: The Tarir Meta Dragon's Stand Chak Gerent All IBS Strikes (including "Easy 3") Desert Bounties A large number of Open Word events

Mini Trahearne is only good on some encounters. Everyone knows mini Jungle Lord Faren is meta. P2W confirmed.

This does not happen. No one cares about your performance until you are proven to fall short of expectations. They arent waiting to inspect you the moment you join a party. No one has the ability to do so.

Honest question: What actual benefit would this provide?

How do we know this? "The community" is a varied group of players with a breadth of goals and desires. The community isn't just the squeaky wheel on the forums.

The current issues with ARC are: 1.It is needlessly complex to properly configure 2.It requires the player to go outside the game to install 3.It requires a plugin for a plugin to effectively measure boon uptime 4.It causes me to CTD under Dx11 (no issues with Dx9) 5. It does not effectively measure group healing numbers 6. It requires updating constantly So yes... a proper ingame solution would absolutely be welcomed in my world. But this idea that it has to be limited to "own stats" just to sell it to people? This thinking that players cannot properly and responsibly handle the data that live combat data provides with some false flag boogeyman of "toxic elitism"? Hard pass. People have been gatekeeping groups since release based on inaccurate metrics such as gear and AP. The existence of ARC has objectively reduced the amount of false information in this community. Actual data is always preferred to rhetoric and anecdotes. Alternatively I would like to see a "post encounter summary" at the end of PvE encounters (raids, Strikes, fractal bosses, dungeon bosses, large Open World Events) very similar to the end of Match summary in sPvP that gave details like Damage Dealt, Boons provided and uptime, rezzes, Defiance Bar contribution ect....

r/thathappened

I guess. I was under the impression that the term "non-consensual" had a very real and specific meaning.

I agree the phrase is is seriously bad taste given the implication. 100% I'm just wondering who came up with it, because it seems like the person I quoted was forcing a line they had heard somewhere into their posts....just wondering where they got it.,

Who came up with this line? ("non-consensual raid boss") I keep seeing it being parroted by one side of this debate... Does anyone know where this line came from?

So you are saying that a legendary rune with a cost of 400g is accessible ...but a Superior Rune of Tormenting with a value less than 10g is not? lol Never change GW2 forums.... never change.

Of course they realize it. This is why it took almost three years for the existing finished sets to be completed as they were spread out as well. Fomo is a thing.