Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Something is not right....


epoc.7941

Recommended Posts

Forum's pepos are getting crazier every time I check... Yeah Phoenix literally stream everyday his ranked game , he has more than 300 games played and already got every titles he could want but ofc his winrate this season is wintrading. Makes so much sense lmao. You guys need to start consulting, the madness is getting worse.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they don't wintrade then they DuoQ to get there, which for the top % of players in this game; all 10 of them, may as well be wintrading anyway. Its like a free win button a lot of the time, and these psychos are fr getting hung up on a technicality saying "its not technically wintrading" 

Sure, you're right. It isn't. It may as well be though. Rat tactics.

 

That DuoQ is never going to get matched against anything close to fair competition because the players that could challenge them don't exist. Its cheesy, more lazy, and out of place in 5v5 conquest. Take that away from them and those numbers drop back down to 60-70% of games won, I guarantee it. 60-70% w/l are normal winrates for someone who queues organically and is individually skilled and familiar with this game's pvp.

When the game was SoloQ-only past 1600 rating, all of these people were nobodies, or even banned for cheating already. The 80, 90, or even 100% of games won trend didn't appear until after DuoQ came back in Season 13.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2022 at 8:39 PM, Multicolorhipster.9751 said:

If they don't wintrade then they DuoQ to get there, which for the top % of players in this game; all 10 of them, may as well be wintrading anyway. Its like a free win button a lot of the time, and these psychos are fr getting hung up on a technicality saying "its not technically wintrading" 

Sure, you're right. It isn't. It may as well be though. Rat tactics.

 

That DuoQ is never going to get matched against anything close to fair competition because the players that could challenge them don't exist. Its cheesy, more lazy, and out of place in 5v5 conquest. Take that away from them and those numbers drop back down to 60-70% of games won, I guarantee it. 60-70% w/l are normal winrates for someone who queues organically and is individually skilled and familiar with this game's pvp.

When the game was SoloQ-only past 1600 rating, all of these people were nobodies, or even banned for cheating already. The 80, 90, or even 100% of games won trend didn't appear until after DuoQ came back in Season 13.

Season 13...such a long time ago...I can't believe this charade is up to 34 now lmao...

Good lord, just put it out of its misery already...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bast.7253 said:


Probably not even golds. Lol

zenyus surely has the skills and this phoenix guy prolly since he played very well in the mota champ

 

if you low gold duo q exploits won't do much for you honestly, since half the game can faceroll you no matter how coordinated you're, and believe 2 gold 2 jumping a plat 1 player prolly won't get the kill, they actually lucky if they don't get killed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JTGuevara.9018 said:

Season 13...such a long time ago...I can't believe this charade is up to 34 now lmao...

Good lord, just put it out of its misery already...

4 years and over a dozen conquest seasons and they still won't even attempt to sample a soloQ arena

Guessing none of this is being talked about in that 'balance philosophy' stream either. Nope, probably just all profession balance which won't even matter in another 3 months when we get our semi-annual balance patch.

 

This unit is content. Beep boop. Engaging forced smile and slow-clap protocol 👏🤖

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Season 11 win rates, solo queue

Season 12 win rates, solo queue

 

my shatty calcs, these are the win rates during solo queue seasons, i need to find the other seasons but you can see there is quite a difference, and MORE REALISTIC outcome...notice the names too....

 

Season 11 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
101 34 135 74.81%
111 67 178 62.36%
137 71 208 65.87%
238 143 381 62.47%
87 39 126 69.05%
112 64 176 63.64%
240 168 408 58.82%
205 118 323 63.47%
300 194 494 60.73%
117 82 199 58.79%
       
       
Season 12 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
143 68 211 67.77%
94 44 138 68.12%
83 39 122 68.03%
221 121 342 64.62%
89 59 148 60.14%
84 49 133 63.16%
104 43 147 70.75%
76 44 120 63.33%
257 219 476 53.99%
186 108 294 63.27%
Edited by Crab Fear.8623
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crab Fear.8623 said:

Season 11 win rates, solo queue

Season 12 win rates, solo queue

 

my shatty calcs, these are the win rates during solo queue seasons, i need to find the other seasons but you can see there is quite a difference, and MORE REALISTIC outcome...notice the names too....

 

Season 11 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
101 34 135 74.81%
111 67 178 62.36%
137 71 208 65.87%
238 143 381 62.47%
87 39 126 69.05%
112 64 176 63.64%
240 168 408 58.82%
205 118 323 63.47%
300 194 494 60.73%
117 82 199 58.79%
       
       
Season 12 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
143 68 211 67.77%
94 44 138 68.12%
83 39 122 68.03%
221 121 342 64.62%
89 59 148 60.14%
84 49 133 63.16%
104 43 147 70.75%
76 44 120 63.33%
257 219 476 53.99%
186 108 294 63.27%

Interesting...a much more distributed spread than what is currently up today. Crab, I don't suppose you have the source for these charts?

Do please let us know if you find anything above season 12. If not, well then...! I suppose the plot thickens doesn't it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Crab Fear.8623 said:

Season 11 win rates, solo queue

Season 12 win rates, solo queue

 

my shatty calcs, these are the win rates during solo queue seasons, i need to find the other seasons but you can see there is quite a difference, and MORE REALISTIC outcome...notice the names too....

 

Season 11 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
101 34 135 74.81%
111 67 178 62.36%
137 71 208 65.87%
238 143 381 62.47%
87 39 126 69.05%
112 64 176 63.64%
240 168 408 58.82%
205 118 323 63.47%
300 194 494 60.73%
117 82 199 58.79%
       
       
Season 12 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
143 68 211 67.77%
94 44 138 68.12%
83 39 122 68.03%
221 121 342 64.62%
89 59 148 60.14%
84 49 133 63.16%
104 43 147 70.75%
76 44 120 63.33%
257 219 476 53.99%
186 108 294 63.27%

Doesnt seem like a huge jump to say you can easily sustain a winrate of 80% or more when you can get to 70% in a much more competitive queue(season 11/12) solo queue, but I guess thats just wintrader bias isnt it?

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

Doesnt seem like a huge jump to say you can easily sustain a winrate of 80% or more when you can get to 70% in a much more competitive queue(season 11/12) solo queue, but I guess thats just wintrader bias isnt it?

Woah woah woah, I'm going to do something you wouldn't expect me to do.

I'm going to gaslight your gaslighting, and tell you to stop talking about win trading.

Stop it.

@Multicolorhipster.9751

Edited by Trevor Boyer.6524
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

Doesnt seem like a huge jump to say you can easily sustain a winrate of 80% or more when you can get to 70% in a much more competitive queue(season 11/12) solo queue, but I guess thats just wintrader bias isnt it?

You are a greatly skilled player, but if you are in a duo of a player of the same caliber, 1700-1800+, it won't really change what you would face a solo player.

The issue is when players of the 1700-1800+ caliber queue on a forced (throws, ect) account that is rated in the 1100s-, while actually being 1700-1800+.

The MM does not take the top player, and if they confirmed it as average, then that would still mean it takes every rating into consideration against the other team.

Yes, top players stream their games, but I've watched, and quite a few times they are on alts. It is odd to me, that they would alt at all....since if you are the best you should be fine always on your main.

But, digression aside, sports and chess allow no alts.

I won't say you got your title unfairly, but if you queued with a top player on an alt, it is quite sus.

I'm not the best player at anything, but im not the worst.

My last point is, i've never seen vallun alt, and he is obvs in the top 10, and many many times solo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, JTGuevara.9018 said:

Interesting...a much more distributed spread than what is currently up today. Crab, I don't suppose you have the source for these charts?

Do please let us know if you find anything above season 12. If not, well then...! I suppose the plot thickens doesn't it!

I linked the pics to end of season in the post, but ill look for more season in my bajillion screens...thats me in the pics.

Edited by Crab Fear.8623
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

Doesnt seem like a huge jump to say you can easily sustain a winrate of 80% or more when you can get to 70% in a much more competitive queue(season 11/12) solo queue, but I guess thats just wintrader bias isnt it?

Guys im not wintrading. I just duoq with a wintrader. And im in a team with people that ate dishonour for selling gizmos and piloting accounts. I would totally not wintrade man, no shot.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 5
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crab Fear.8623 said:

You are a greatly skilled player, but if you are in a duo of a player of the same caliber, 1700-1800+, it won't really change what you would face a solo player.

The issue is when players of the 1700-1800+ caliber queue on a forced (throws, ect) account that is rated in the 1100s-, while actually being 1700-1800+.

The MM does not take the top player, and if they confirmed it as average, then that would still mean it takes every rating into consideration against the other team.

Yes, top players stream their games, but I've watched, and quite a few times they are on alts. It is odd to me, that they would alt at all....since if you are the best you should be fine always on your main.

But, digression aside, sports and chess allow no alts.

I won't say you got your title unfairly, but if you queued with a top player on an alt, it is quite sus.

I'm not the best player at anything, but im not the worst.

My last point is, i've never seen vallun alt, and he is obvs in the top 10, and many many times solo

So you are completely right in where the matchmaker takes the average rating, so blah blah blah should get harder games cause more rating, BUT consider how even when you're solo qing above 1600 you're *always* getting 7 minute queues, which blah blah getting the same games either way.

Top players queue on alts because while rating doesn't mean anything overall, the legend badge looks cool, and realistically thats the reason. Theres no reason to care about your rating, eventually you reach a point and throw it all away, but until then you get a cooler looking badge. Theres also obviously the ego reason, while rating means nothing, it also does mean something at the same time.

To keep that rating, you do need to duo queue, you might need to queue dodge players that are duoing(at that rating you can beat that duo 4 times and lose once and lose a ton of rating overall still). 

You can easily get these winrates, but its not sustainable with a normal play pattern. Thats why people use alts. Because people still want to queue, but want to keep their rating or badge.

It is obviously not ideal, and it is "abuse" or whatever you want to call it, but things like this aren't a sign of wintrading or match manipulation. You might say its match manipulation, I personally am of the mind set that only behavior taken in matches or prior to matches that if they were to happen would have an impact, as match manipulation.(q dodging does not count, but saying you can queue but if you get in the game throw, does count) as an example. 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Trevor Boyer.6524 said:

Woah woah woah, I'm going to do something you wouldn't expect me to do.

I'm going to gaslight your gaslighting, and tell you to stop talking about win trading.

Stop it.

9 hours ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

Doesnt seem like a huge jump to say you can easily sustain a winrate of 80% or more when you can get to 70% in a much more competitive queue(season 11/12) solo queue, but I guess thats just wintrader bias isnt it?

If you can do that so 'easily' then you think someone would have done it, but they didn't.

As to the gaslighting, doesn't really work when the person trying to gaslight you is being this obvious in their lies.

7 hours ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

So you are completely right in where the matchmaker takes the average rating, so blah blah blah should get harder games cause more rating, BUT consider how even when you're solo qing above 1600 you're *always* getting 7 minute queues, which blah blah getting the same games either way.

Like this, just outwardly bull kitten. I consistently averaged around that rating 1600-1700 when I still played and its the opposite of what he's saying.

SoloQ is way faster at 1600 rating. It was like a 3-5 minute soloQ back in Season 18, but if you were to DuoQ, especially with someone way below your rating, that would boost your queue times to 7 up to even maybe 10 minute queues.

If SoloQs had to wait longer than teams to play, then nobody would SoloQ because then you'd be waiting longer to queue at a disadvantage with total RNG matchmaking. That's why they call the YoloQ what it is. Its fast soloQ games that you're probably going to lose, but by sheer quantity of games played alone, you occasionally break through.

7 hours ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

It is obviously not ideal, and it is "abuse" or whatever you want to call it, but things like this aren't a sign of wintrading or match manipulation. You might say its match manipulation, I personally am of the mind set that only behavior taken in matches or prior to matches that if they were to happen would have an impact, as match manipulation.(q dodging does not count, but saying you can queue but if you get in the game throw, does count) as an example. 

Really wants to get technical with the wording. Lets just call it abuse then. 

Because that's what people want in their video game, to be 'abused' 😂 

Does it really have to be wintrading, match manipulation, or 'abuse?' How about none of that and just play the game?

The cartel definitely lives up to the name. 😨

Edited by Multicolorhipster.9751
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Multicolorhipster.9751 said:

If you can do that so 'easily' then you think someone would have done it, but they didn't.

As to the gaslighting, doesn't really work when the person trying to gaslight you is being this obvious in their lies.

Like this, just outwardly bull kitten. I consistently averaged around that rating 1600-1700 when I still played and its the opposite of what he's saying.

SoloQ is way faster at 1600 rating. It was like a 3-5 minute soloQ back in Season 18, but if you were to DuoQ, especially with someone way below your rating, that would boost your queue times to 7 up to even maybe 10 minute queues.

If SoloQs had to wait longer than teams to play, then nobody would SoloQ because then you'd be waiting longer to queue at a disadvantage with total RNG matchmaking. That's why they call the YoloQ what it is. Its fast soloQ games that you're probably going to lose, but by sheer quantity of games played alone, you occasionally break through.

Really wants to get technical with the wording. Lets just call it abuse then. 

Because that's what people want in their video game, to be 'abused' 😂 

Does it really have to be wintrading, match manipulation, or 'abuse?' How about none of that and just play the game?

The cartel definitely lives up to the name. 😨

sry not gonna read all of that since u obviously dont care about having real discourse!

  • Confused 7
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2022 at 7:09 AM, Crab Fear.8623 said:

Season 11 win rates, solo queue

Season 12 win rates, solo queue

 

my shatty calcs, these are the win rates during solo queue seasons, i need to find the other seasons but you can see there is quite a difference, and MORE REALISTIC outcome...notice the names too....

 

Season 11 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
101 34 135 74.81%
111 67 178 62.36%
137 71 208 65.87%
238 143 381 62.47%
87 39 126 69.05%
112 64 176 63.64%
240 168 408 58.82%
205 118 323 63.47%
300 194 494 60.73%
117 82 199 58.79%
       
       
Season 12 Top 10
Wins Losses Totals Win Rate
143 68 211 67.77%
94 44 138 68.12%
83 39 122 68.03%
221 121 342 64.62%
89 59 148 60.14%
84 49 133 63.16%
104 43 147 70.75%
76 44 120 63.33%
257 219 476 53.99%
186 108 294 63.27%

 

DONT YOU FLAUNT THAT CHART ON US.....

gone were the days when competition felt fair. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Grimjack.8130 said:

Doesnt seem like a huge jump to say you can easily sustain a winrate of 80% or more when you can get to 70% in a much more competitive queue(season 11/12) solo queue, but I guess thats just wintrader bias isnt it?

 

I don't know you but do know that you play ele like a madman. Why you even at the forum? Lemme guess, for entertainment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...