Warclaw is an ugly mount.

I said it.The gem skins are ugly too.
(this is an opinion, obv, for those who want to defend Warclaw.)

'k.

I still like them anyway.

Yeah the horn thing is definitely fugly. The whole pack deal was garbage. I mean really, dont sell skins that are basically the same and have slight artwork on the armor. Bad decision on anets part.

Skins were sold? Yep. I don't see how this is bad decision - skins themselves differ enough to be distinctive. If you really waited for transmogrificaiton-like skins where warclaw becomes Garfield - wrong game bro.Anyway, thanks for the insight of your thoughts. Following this trend of one-sentence-threads...should I make another one titled "WARCLAW IS NOT AN UGLY MOUNT."?

@Chasind.3128 said:I said it.The gem skins are ugly too.

Coyote Ugly ????

I like my Embermane very much, thank you.

I don't find it particularly ugly, though I weren't a huge fan of most skins recently added, two of them are basically just the base skin with red eyes and slightly different dye patterns. Definitely not a fan of the fact they were only sold in a bundle either, instead of the bundle being a "deal" offering where you got the skins for x Gems cheaper than if you were to buy the skins individually, with each of them being offered up for purchase as well. ArenaNet's Gem Store team sure does like to scratch me the wrong way and build up brand resentment which closes my wallet further and further for future additions added to the store. But I guess they only like to look at things short-term. That's obviously the smart way to do business. Not to create brand loyalty with good offers and options. Create resentment instead, make people less and less interested in spending money. It's a smart business decision that all companies should follow suit on.

Different people like different things. I, for one, like eyebrows cat.

yep, the only style available should be human female meta with a tiny body and skimpy + glowy armor.or, perhaps not...

I LOVE Fashion stuff on this game. Anets Devs are crazy good for that. But you know, as all artists they cant release perfect stuff all the time. I mean, look all those fabulous infusions we had... and then toy infusion arrived..Look all those cute mounts we had since PoF! And all those crazy mounts skins!I agree this is not a cute mount, for me the basic mount is more for Charrs.But :

• 1 ugly basic skin on 7 mounts its still a good succes rate
  • Maybe next gem skins will be much better than actual ones.

Even if it take time, i'm pretty sure they will release (at the very least) one Beautiful skin on this mount too.

You're not suppose to date the mount.

I work with some ugly people too but they're invaluable and awesome.

One of my superiors showed me a picture of an ugly wild boar he took out a couple years back, he said it was delicious.

Ugly things can still be beautiful on the inside.

Considering the height of GW2 fashion is a neon pink/purple chrono with as many auras as you can fit on her, I'll just take this critique with a grain of salt.

@ElectricGoat.8253 said:Ugly things can still be beautiful on the inside.

Agree, and not to forget that it remains a matter of personal taste: Someone can find something ugly whereas someone else will find the exact same thing looking good. Fortunately I would say! Many of my friends in game do love the warclaw's appearance. Personally, I do love the kitty skin for it. <3

I dont like Purple Color

lets discuss that too

For a battle kitty I tkink it's a cool skin, however I would have removed the helmet / tail armors or at least making them more feline, embracing the shape of the spirit within it. The head feel unnatural and confusing.

I don't mind the looks much. But I think the animation is somewhat lacking compared to the other mounts we have. I saw it in PvE lately and it just looks kind of out of place? It reminds me of mounts from other MMOs, somehow. In comparison, the raptors and bunnies seem to have more detailed and well done animations that make them fit into the world and environment better.

As a battle mount, I think the design fits for what it's intended to do. What's that old saying? "form follows function"

I love that mount.

It's not ugly. It's utilitarian.

I like the idea, waiting for a cool premium skin.

Umm good for you? I'll be here sitting on my cool epic branded warclaw and feeding it dreamies

Heh. Warclaw is my favorite mount.

Not liking the first batch of skins though.

@"mortrialus.3062" said:It's not ugly. It's utilitarian.

It looks like an absolute unit, built for battle.

As it should.

People are just upset it's not """cute"""

@Substance E.4852 said:

@"mortrialus.3062" said:It's not ugly. It's utilitarian.

I don't want it to be cute. Just not ugly.