What do you want for GW2?

[Ruufio.1496]

Would you rather have:

(Forgot to add new races, underwater overhaul/mount and underwater weapons on land/new elite specs and new expansion to top choice. So much content possible that I can't remember it all)

[coso.9173]

gw2 without its living story is a game without story progress, and that means a dead MMO.

[Ruufio.1496]

@coso.9173 said:gw2 without its living story is a game without story progress, and that means a dead MMO.

Oldschool RuneScape focused on content. RuneScape 3 focused on story and gem store. Which one is alive?

[Ashantara.8731]

Where is my third option? Namely, "Great story contents through expansions."

[coso.9173]

@Ruufio.1496 said:

@coso.9173 said:gw2 without its living story is a game without story progress, and that means a dead MMO.

Oldschool RuneScape focused on content. RuneScape 3 focused on story and gem store. Which one is alive?

i haven't played any of them so i have no idea. but a MMO without new story content quickly loses most of it playerbase, simple as that.

[Tarlonniel.6534]

I don't see a single thing I care about in the first option. Except maybe "completely new types of content," but that could mean anything.

[Donari.5237]

Seems a very biased poll, especially when you break down the first thing into a lot of detailed categories and lump the second thing (which would include new maps and improvements on old maps, new items and collections, new masteries, etc) all into one short name. Also no option for Why Not Both? They do in fact roll out things you list in option one as part of option two releases.

[Vavume.8065]

I would add elite specs and new races to that list.

[Tiviana.2650]

While i voted for the 1st the fact is it shouldnt ever be a choice between one or the other. Where is the choice to have an all around well versed game? Where you work to put out content for everyone? You have the game modes in the game, you dont let them collect dust you improve them and advance them. The fact is you attracted those players with raids and pvp and wvw and open world , now you want to cut them off and focus on LWS? Something that isnt even mmo like, its solo instance content. You should always be making new content, and expanding and balancing the game systems thats your job. You cant just put out one thing wipe your hands and say done. All successful games have developers working on content for those games years in advance so its ready to go as they go along.

Im fine if they never want to do expansions, but they need to put out new things on a decent timeframe. New things means specs zones races classes quest types new types of pvp and wvw maps and grouping new raids balances new armors and weapons. Things could be released over a year by adding them in every month or 2.

[b k.1648]

Don't expect people will provide honest answers with the poll options written like that. I certainly didn't.

[rchristianhk.3914]

story may be fine and important and all that but if there is no content to play between story then the game is dead (which mostly is for me)

[Trise.2865]

What a completely fair and unbiased poll. "Living Story" or "Literally Anything Else".

[Obtena.7952]

@"Trise.2865" said:What a completely fair and unbiased poll. "Living Story" or "Literally Anything Else".

The truth is that this poll isn't about understanding what people want. It's to make a point.

[RyuDragnier.9476]

@Obtena.7952 said:

@"Trise.2865" said:What a completely fair and unbiased poll. "Living Story" or "Literally Anything Else".

The truth is that this poll isn't about understanding what people want. It's to make a point.

Then it's not a poll, it's a petty mess.

[Obtena.7952]

@RyuDragnier.9476 said:

@Obtena.7952 said:

@"Trise.2865" said:What a completely fair and unbiased poll. "Living Story" or "Literally Anything Else".

The truth is that this poll isn't about understanding what people want. It's to make a point.

Then it's not a poll, it's a petty mess.

If you want to learn more, just check post history by the OP ... THEN you will get some context to why this poll exists. If you want a quick snapshot:

@Ruufio.1496 said:But don't worry - I'm not playing it, or anything else.

[AlexxxDelta.1806]

Yes, lets put all other gamemodes combined against that one gamemode in this totally not skewed poll.

[Bewt.9258]

I voted Living Story just to spite this dumb biased poll.

[Blackarps.1974]

@coso.9173 said:gw2 without its living story is a game without story progress, and that means a dead MMO.

You can tell a compelling story without devoting nearly all your company resources and 3 months of time to it.

[zealex.9410]

I just want expansions man, expansions and instanced pve content. Just stsrt selling content as dlc and let me buy it ;_;

Also, holy fuck man your poll is biased.

[Doug.4930]

Waayyyyy to much time put into the Living story.Months of time put into single play only content.

No I don't think this poll is skewed. Because presently Anet puts the vast majority of its investment into the living story while neglecting everything else. This poll reflects that people would prefer it if some of their resources were focused in other areas also.

[Linken.6345]

Bad poll cant answer it since I want 2 and dont want 80% of 1 but still want 1

[Mewcifer.5198]

This poll is biased.

[Teratus.2859]

I want both those options, along with a new expansion.

Don't see why we can't have all three.

[FrigginPaco.4178]

I voted for the first option, but it's a crazy biased poll. I want third option, where everything gets done via expansion and updates along the side. I'm just pissed that SOMEHOW, they don't seem to have the resources available to do more concentrated and deep releases? How?? They make so much and this is the limit that we can expect? I don't believe it.

[Vayne.8563]

Even with the obvious bias of the poll, a third of the population voted for living story. That should answer any doubts anyone has. The living world is more popular than a lot of people think it is.